A report just released by the National Audit Office says that the Ministry of Defence lost the taxpayer around £14.5 billion over the life of the Annington Homes deal, compared to where we would be if the 1996 deal had never happened.
But there is also praise for the action finally taken by MoD to repurchase more than 36,000 service family homes in England and Wales for £6 billion.
The deal involved the transfer to the private sector of the bulk of the MOD's service family accommodation (SFA) in England. It was widely criiticised, increasingly so as the maintenance standard of SFA under a separate contract was seen as deteriorating, and when surplus accommodation was being released for the market, the MOD had to pay to refurbish the properties before being sold for private sector profit.
The NAO had reported that the MoD’s main aims had been "to secure funds for upgrade work; improve management of the estate; and secure value for money through a competitive sale." [Comment: There were 19 bidders.] They had found that "the sale and leaseback appeared to satisfy the MoD’s immediate objectives. However, the sale price was lower than the value of retaining the estate, and the MoD retained important responsibilities for managing it."
So although there were rational objectives for the deal at the time, there were criticisms at the time which only increased in the new century.
Although as ever there were financial pressures